Three options in your real site styling. Nothing has been pushed to uprisegrowth.io. Pick one and I will ship it.
Every number below is taken verbatim from inthebrandlab.com, pulled from the page's own stat block. The figures are Brand Lab's managed client results, not yours, and every version below says so explicitly.
Note: you said $20M. Their published figure is +$19M. Using their real number is the version that survives someone checking.
Sits under the existing footer row. Present for anyone who looks, invisible to anyone who does not, and it never competes with Lee and the before/after that actually sell.
Reads as background rather than a boast, because it sits next to your story. Best if you ever add a proper about block, which you currently do not have.
I learned this inside Brand Lab, the DTC paid-media team running $4.4M in managed ad spend at a 4.2X average account ROAS.
Most visible, weakest position. A wrap shop owner has never heard of Brand Lab, and borrowed numbers this high up invite the question of which results are actually yours. Shown so you can judge it, not because I would run it.
Option A. The claim is true, it is attributed, and it is small. Borrowed authority works best as a footnote, because the moment it is a headline a prospect starts wondering which numbers on the page are actually yours.
Whichever you pick, the wording stays explicit that +$19M is Brand Lab's client revenue, not Uprise's. That one word of attribution is what keeps this a credential instead of an implied earnings claim on a site that sells marketing services.
The thing that will actually close a wrap shop is the Lee before and after, Katelyne's testimonial, and mimicairo.com being live. This line is a supporting detail, not the proof.